Whether you are developing software for a desktop or mobile app, a website, or a web application, you need to have confidence in its quality. And to measure the quality, you need to test it.
But the issue is who is going to do that? Should you consider your in-house testing team or hire an outside testing firm?
In truth, everything is dependent on your company objectives, and the best option is made depending on your needs and goals. Some people believe that outsourcing testing is a good idea, while others believe it is a waste of money and that having your testing team is far more convenient. Some are correct; both approaches have benefits and drawbacks.
Let us explore the best between these.
Why Should You Consider Outsourced QA?
Customer experience has surged to the top of the QA priority list. This user-centric technology revolution was impossible a decade ago. Today, Customer-centric digital transformation initiatives have transformed the way businesses use technology. The increased use of DevOps, cloud, and agile in new tech has changed the testing approaches.
You are undoubtedly aware that one of the most overlooked areas of software development initiatives is software quality assurance. Two of the most prevalent causes for software being deployed with faults include; a lack of specialized testing resources and a requirement to complete the software project fast. Outsourcing software QA might be a viable option, not just in terms of cost but also in meeting the ambitious objectives.
Moreover, it is expensive to fix a defect in an application once launched or delivered. As a result, organizations now consider successful software QA testing as mission-critical. It is critical to accomplish the assignment with the help of all available resources. In addition to this, outsourcing is now a cost-effective method for achieving superior company results.
Here Is What Experts Say…
Choosing between in-house and outsourced testing is a difficult option. Many businesses believe that outsourcing their software testing needs is a wise business option. Other businesses, on the other hand, believe that outsourcing is a waste of money and that in-house testing is the way to go. The argument is that no one is likely to be entirely correct. It depends on your aims and goals whether you select in-house testing or outsource your QA efforts. It also relies on your budget and the time range in which you must distribute your software product to the public.
Having said that, the fact is that outsourcing software testing is a better option than forming an entire team. Simply put, when all factors are taken into account, outsourcing QA is a considerably superior method of conducting business. How could we say that?
In order to provide our readers with genuine and authentic knowledge, we examined various companies offering Software Quality Assurance for diversified development environments. One such Company is Smash Cloud, which has a team of testers that use both automated and manual testing techniques. A senior test automation engineer at the company shared, “The biggest benefit we see with clients when we’re working as an outsourced QA team is that their engineers get to spend more time on development instead of just testing, and end application users don’t have poor experiences.”
To name a few, some advantages of Outsourced Testing include:
- It frees you for growth leverage
- Outsourced SQA saves your productivity time.
- No need to hire a full-time employee. Hence, save wages.
- You can have access to expert resources from the globe
As we know that, nothing in this world is perfect. Outsourced QA also have some cons. Here are a few:
- It takes time to outline your precise requirements.
- It may be rather pricey at times.
- Not everyone is a good fit for outsourcing. It is not suitable for everyone.
- There is a risk of confidentiality. You may violate it by sharing your source codes and implementation strategies.
Why You Shouldn’t Consider In-House QA?
In-house testing teams who do rigorous manual and automated testing have always handled quality Assurance. This was acceptable when you just deployed once every six months, but current firms such as Amazon, Facebook, and Google ship hundreds of times every day. Today, it is very hard to ship rapidly and regularly while maintaining quality with in-house QA, and this is hurting your business.
The biggest problem with in-house QA is that it cannot keep up with the deployment schedule that your business needs to be competitive. In essence, in-house quality assurance is a flaw in the process. It is incredibly slow and difficult, and once you try to deploy regularly, it rapidly becomes a bottleneck in your development process. This is becoming increasingly important to your business as the industry promotes continuous deployment.
Aside from the issue of actually hiring people, deciding how big the team should be is difficult. Because there is always, a tradeoff between total productivity during peak demand and the number of individuals laying idle during inactive periods, scaling a human team with linear marginal returns is tough.
Unfortunately, automated testing is not an option since it necessitates programming ability, and your product’s stakeholders are not programmers. Among them are UX designers, Product Managers, Marketers, and Ops professionals. Even if you have a large team of programmers, you should avoid wasting their time creating test scripts.
A feasible option is to hire a QA partner from the beginning to handle all aspects of testing, including manual, performance, security, test automation, and shift left on your growth path.
If you ask just about any expert in the software-testing field if you should outsource your QA testing, they will all say, “It depends.” It is true; we have both stated essentially the same thing.
However, the fact is that outsourcing QA is nearly always a better option than establishing a crew. Simply said, it is a better approach to operate when you consider all factors.
So always, consider the compelling arguments in favor of outsourcing QA that this guide covers whenever you opt for outsourcing a QA service.